Throw Away Your Television

by paet the pagan-gerbil 18. October 2010 16:32

I’ve not been a huge TV fan for a long time. So when I have to choose between paying around £150 or not watching television for a year, it’s a pretty easy choice to make. I like to have money in my pocket, and I don’t like watching television.

I’m sick and tired of TV Licensing presuming that I am a criminal because of this. In our previous house, we called up soon after moving in to say “this is who we are, this is not a student house, we don’t watch television” as they ask people to. They sent someone round to check, and we were told we were on a three-year block and wouldn’t be bothered again in that time. One year later, more letters and having to explain on the phone (again, not being treated with a lot of respect – the assumption being that you have a licence or you’re lying to them) that it’s still not a student property but being told “it used to be one.” Yes, it used to be one, now it’s not... so they sent someone round to check again and *gasp* – we’re still not watching television. The following year, I just binned the letters unopened. We were moving house soon anyway.

In the new house, I didn’t bother to call and explain. It only annoys me when the reaction to “I don’t watch television, I don’t need a licence” is “yeah, right” and a repeat of the “you will be fined if you’re caught watching television.” If they believe I’m a criminal, I dare them to press charges. I’m innocent until proven guilty. Still, they sent someone round who told us that, again, we’re on a three-year block in our new house (the block, apparently, is on a property rather than an individual).

The block lasted only nine months. I bought a new television (for games and DVDs), and I received monthly reminders. They’re more polite than they used to be – for example, they no longer threaten court action and fines right off the bat, but list all the ways you can pay for the television that you must be watching, because who doesn’t watch television? But they still feel a little patronising to me. Since the phone number is not free to call and the envelope provided isn’t Freepost (it says ‘please attach a stamp’, when they’re already asking you to put £150 in it!) I do nothing. There’s no reason for me to expend any money (however trivial) in telling someone I’m not a criminal, especially when they won’t even believe me (or at least have the decency to hide that fact behind a polite telephone manner).

Now, I get home from work and there’s a note pushed through with the time their ‘Enforcement Officer’ called round, but we weren’t in. It is labelled “We told you we’d call.” It’s a little bit menacing, and raises the irritation all over again. As you can tell, it’s a subject I get pretty annoyed about. If I obey the law, I don’t like people to treat me like I don’t. It’s like if the police stopped every single motorist to test them for drink-driving, no exceptions. Everyone who’s been chugging along obeying the law quite happily is treated like a criminal.

If I’m home when they call again, I’ll ask about the three-year block. I don’t want  I checked up, and unless they bring a search warrant from the police they have no right to come in my home. Since they’ve already checked this home once, and my previous address twice, and found nothing to concern them, I don’t really think they’re being fair. The three year block from the first time they checked me, albeit in a previous address, only ran out a month ago. The second block was only put on last year, and so should be covering me till 2012.

On the other hand, since most of the TV Licence fee goes to Capita (the company enforcing and administering the licence), it’d be a shame to waste the money that my friends have paid for a licence by not making them run around chasing me, bothering me, harassing me and treating me like a criminal. If they didn’t spend it on their patronising letters or bothersome enforcers, they’d just pocket it. And who thinks that’s value for money?

Tags: , ,

General | Journal

Comments

10/18/2010 11:05:35 PM #

Daniel Kelly

Probably doesn't help that the "enforcement officers" are on commission

http://bit.ly/9RY9dr

Daniel Kelly United Kingdom

10/18/2010 11:23:34 PM #

Ben W

Oddly, I've had quite a different experience. They sent the standard letter when I moved in here; I told them I had no TV, and although they said they would follow up with a check, they never did — and I'm in almost all day! (Home office FTW)

Ben W United Kingdom

10/19/2010 3:27:07 AM #

Cassie

We had lots of threatening letters (and we DID have a TV, but refused to pay for a licence because we're convict Australian bastards), but no-one ever showed. They grew more and more aggressive, then went back to the beginning again - apparently there's a letter loop. Now we're back home and they'll never, ever get our £150. We're probably the reason you guys went into recession. Muhahahaha!

Seriously, though, wouldn't it be cheaper just to take a little extra tax from everyone to pay for the BBC? How much of that £150 is wasted on harassing people?

Cassie Australia

10/19/2010 12:31:04 PM #

pagan-gerbil

A tax on television will be unfair to people who will not or can not pay for it, even if it's cheaper. It would also be a nuisance for people who currently don't pay tax (no income, and exempt from council tax) who are probably watching more television than I ever will, and more than likely dodging the licence fee already anyway. So I'm fine with the system as it is, because it's cheaper for me.

Bristol is home to Capita's TV licencing departments, because it's the city with the most offenders. Presumably, that's why I've been visited by so many enforcers.

If the officers are on commission, I will be even happier to make them visit again, and again, and again to see how desperate they are for the cash!

pagan-gerbil United Kingdom

10/19/2010 12:33:06 PM #

pagan-gerbil

nuisance for people who currently don't pay tax
I meant - 'nuisance to collect from people who currently don't pay tax'.

Like I said, I oppose a blanket tax on television because at the end of the day, they'd still have to exclude me and still pay outsourced companies too much money to presume I'm claiming exemption untruthfully.

pagan-gerbil United Kingdom

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading




Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.6.0.0
Theme by Pete Fullergreen, based on one by Mads Kristensen

Calendar

<<  May 2012  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910

View posts in large calendar
Shop at Amazon.co.uk